Old Noarlunga vs Seaford Rise, SA Suburb Comparison

Old Noarlunga for schools; Seaford Rise for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Old NoarlungaSeaford Rise

Overall score

Old Noarlunga

33.1/100

Seaford Rise

32.6/100

Crime rate

Old Noarlunga

99.1 / 1k

Seaford Rise

37.4 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Old Noarlunga

61

Seaford Rise

81

Population

Old Noarlunga

1,531

Seaford Rise

6,105

Metric leadOld Noarlunga 4Seaford Rise 71 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryOld NoarlungaSeaford Rise
Overall score33.1/10032.6/100
Housing (desirability)67.7/10063.7/100
Crime rate99.1 / 1k37.4 / 1k
Schools & preschools13
Weather (desirability)56.4/10056.4/100
Public transport stops1533
Walkability38.5/10030.0/100
Nearby amenities6181
Planning activity2635
Green cover0.4%8.1%
Population1,5316,105
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)2/103/10

Comparison summary

Old Noarlunga reads as an energetic metro smaller community where cafés and local life overlap; Seaford Rise is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby.

Old Noarlunga tends to lead on walkability and a calmer planning outlook, while Seaford Rise stands out for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and schools and education options. On housing, Old Noarlunga sits in a affordable band, compared with a expensive feel in Seaford Rise.

On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Seaford Rise, while Old Noarlunga remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons