Orana vs Robinson, WA Suburb Comparison

Orana for retirees and families; Robinson for investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

OranaRobinson

Overall score

Orana

43.7/100

Robinson

37.3/100

Crime rate

Orana

50.0 / 1k

Robinson

50.0 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Orana

36

Robinson

2

Population

Orana

2,035

Robinson

696

Metric leadOrana 7Robinson 12 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryOranaRobinson
Overall score43.7/10037.3/100
Housing (desirability)67.8/10045.9/100
Crime rate50.0 / 1k50.0 / 1k
Schools & preschools6—
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Public transport stops93
Walkability46.5/1004.5/100
Nearby amenities362
Green cover1.6%0.0%
Population2,035696
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)1/106/10

Comparison summary

Orana is a regional smaller community with local services and a more relaxed pace, while Robinson is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds.

Orana pulls ahead on housing affordability, public transport access, and walkability, whereas Robinson is the better pick for stronger socioeconomic advantage.

Families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools may find Orana the better fit, while retirees are more likely to prefer Robinson.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons