Overall score
Orana
43.7/100
Robinson
37.3/100
Orana for retirees and families; Robinson for investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Orana
43.7/100
Robinson
37.3/100
Crime rate
Orana
50.0 / 1k
Robinson
50.0 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Orana
36
Robinson
2
Population
Orana
2,035
Robinson
696
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Orana | Robinson |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 43.7/100 | 37.3/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 67.8/100 | 45.9/100 |
| Crime rate | 50.0 / 1k | 50.0 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 6 | — |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Public transport stops | 9 | 3 |
| Walkability | 46.5/100 | 4.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 36 | 2 |
| Green cover | 1.6% | 0.0% |
| Population | 2,035 | 696 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 1/10 | 6/10 |
Orana is a regional smaller community with local services and a more relaxed pace, while Robinson is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds.
Orana pulls ahead on housing affordability, public transport access, and walkability, whereas Robinson is the better pick for stronger socioeconomic advantage.
Families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools may find Orana the better fit, while retirees are more likely to prefer Robinson.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.