Overall score
Pennington
33.2/100
Royal Park
43.8/100
Pennington vs Royal Park, SA Suburb Comparison
Pennington for investment; Royal Park for retirees and schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
PenningtonRoyal Park
Crime rate
Pennington
102.2 / 1k
Royal Park
67.2 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Pennington
111
Royal Park
175
Population
Pennington
3,773
Royal Park
3,453
Metric leadPennington 2Royal Park 82 tiedacross 12 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesRoyal Park
- Best for investmentPennington
- Best for best schoolsRoyal Park
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Pennington | Royal Park |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 33.2/100 | 43.8/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 49.6/100 | 64.7/100 |
| Crime rate | 102.2 / 1k | 67.2 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 3 | 3 |
| Weather (desirability) | 56.4/100 | 56.4/100 |
| Public transport stops | 15 | 19 |
| Walkability | 30.5/100 | 82.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 111 | 175 |
| Planning activity | 32 | 51 |
| Green cover | 2.4% | 4.6% |
| Population | 3,773 | 3,453 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 2/10 | 3/10 |
Comparison summary
Pennington reads as an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap; Royal Park is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby.
Pennington tends to lead on a calmer planning outlook and a larger local community, while Royal Park stands out for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and public transport access. On housing, Pennington sits in a affordable band, compared with a expensive feel in Royal Park.
On balance, retirees, families, investors, and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Royal Park, while Pennington remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.