Royal Park vs Semaphore Park, SA suburb comparison

Royal Park for retirees and families; Semaphore Park for beach lifestyle.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Royal ParkSemaphore Park

Overall score

Royal Park

54.1/100

Semaphore Park

46.3/100

Crime rate

Royal Park

65.5 / 1k

Semaphore Park

95.8 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Royal Park

174

Semaphore Park

191

Population

Royal Park

3,453

Semaphore Park

4,541

Metric leadRoyal Park 5Semaphore Park 41 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryRoyal ParkSemaphore Park
Overall score54.1/10046.3/100
Housing (desirability)47.7/10054.9/100
Crime rate65.5 / 1k95.8 / 1k
Schools & preschools32
Parks & reserves1
Public transport stops1925
Walkability82.5/10032.0/100
Nearby amenities174191
Planning activity4348
Population3,4534,541
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)3/103/10

Comparison summary

Royal Park reads as a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby; Semaphore Park is a beachside mid-sized suburb where the coast sets the tone. Semaphore Park leans into coastal living, while Royal Park feels more inland and suburban in character.

On the data, Royal Park is stronger for a quieter safety profile and schools and education options; Semaphore Park answers with housing affordability and public transport access.

Retirees and families may find Royal Park the better fit, while people chasing a beach lifestyle and investors are more likely to prefer Semaphore Park.

Related comparisons