Overall score
Petersham
63.3/100
St Peters
59.1/100
St Peters for investment and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Petersham
63.3/100
St Peters
59.1/100
Crime rate
Petersham
54.8 / 1k
St Peters
85.1 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Petersham
242
St Peters
197
Population
Petersham
8,200
St Peters
3,629
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Petersham | St Peters |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 63.3/100 | 59.1/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 9.8/100 | 25.2/100 |
| Crime rate | 54.8 / 1k | 85.1 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 30 | 9 |
| Parks & reserves | 4 | 3 |
| Public transport stops | 61 | 38 |
| Walkability | 100.0/100 | 85.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 242 | 197 |
| Planning activity | 47 | 17 |
| Population | 8,200 | 3,629 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Petersham is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby, while St Peters is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.
Petersham pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile and schools and education options, whereas St Peters is the better pick for housing affordability and a calmer planning outlook.
Families and households prioritising schools may find Petersham the better fit, while investors are more likely to prefer St Peters.