Overall score
Port Kennedy
44.1/100
Warnbro
44.2/100
Port Kennedy vs Warnbro, WA Suburb Comparison
Port Kennedy for families and investment; Warnbro for retirees.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
Port KennedyWarnbro
Crime rate
Port Kennedy
59.7 / 1k
Warnbro
59.7 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Port Kennedy
197
Warnbro
97
Population
Port Kennedy
13,477
Warnbro
10,828
Metric leadPort Kennedy 4Warnbro 52 tiedacross 11 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesWarnbro
- Best for familiesPort Kennedy
- Best for investmentPort Kennedy
- Best for best valuePort Kennedy
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Port Kennedy | Warnbro |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 44.1/100 | 44.2/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 48.0/100 | 49.2/100 |
| Crime rate | 59.7 / 1k | 59.7 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 4 | 8 |
| Weather (desirability) | 23.4/100 | 23.4/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 4 | — |
| Public transport stops | 57 | 64 |
| Walkability | 90.0/100 | 82.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 197 | 97 |
| Green cover | 2.3% | 8.3% |
| Population | 13,477 | 10,828 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 4/10 | 2/10 |
Comparison summary
Put side by side, Port Kennedy is a coastal established suburb shaped by beach life and outdoor living, and Warnbro is a coastal established suburb with an easy, sea-led rhythm.
On the data, Port Kennedy is stronger for housing affordability, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities; Warnbro answers with schools and education options, plus public transport access.
Port Kennedy suits retirees, families, investors, and value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas Warnbro is the stronger match for households prioritising schools.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.