Port Macquarie vs Mount Gambier suburb comparison (NSW vs SA)
Which suburb suits you better?
Side-by-side comparison of 16 categories from official government and open data.
| Category | Port Macquarie | Mount Gambier |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 56.1/100 | 67.1/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 60.2/100 | 55.7/100 |
| Crime rate | 92.2 / 1k | 71.8 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 19 | 20 |
| Parks & reserves | 37 | — |
| Public transport stops | 653 | 121 |
| Walkability | 53.0/100 | 100.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 139 | 553 |
| Planning activity | 179 | 159 |
| Population | 47,693 | 25,591 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 4/10 | 1/10 |
Quick verdicts
- Best for best valueMount Gambier
- Best for best schoolsPort Macquarie
Comparison summary
Across states, Port Macquarie is a regional larger suburb with local services and a more relaxed pace, whereas Mount Gambier is a leafier hillside larger suburb with elevated outlooks. Mount Gambier sits among greener hillside streets, while Port Macquarie keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Port Macquarie tends to lead on housing affordability and public transport access, while Mount Gambier stands out for a quieter safety profile and schools and education options. On housing, Port Macquarie sits in a expensive band, compared with a affordable feel in Mount Gambier.
Choose Port Macquarie if you are weighing households prioritising schools; lean toward Mount Gambier for value-focused buyers.