Queens Park vs St James, WA Suburb Comparison

St James for investment and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Queens ParkSt James

Overall score

Queens Park

41.7/100

St James

45.9/100

Crime rate

Queens Park

77.5 / 1k

St James

77.5 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Queens Park

176

St James

81

Population

Queens Park

7,268

St James

4,894

Metric leadQueens Park 5St James 43 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryQueens ParkSt James
Overall score41.7/10045.9/100
Housing (desirability)36.1/10049.9/100
Crime rate77.5 / 1k77.5 / 1k
Schools & preschools77
Weather (desirability)23.4/10023.4/100
Parks & reserves87
Public transport stops5624
Walkability57.0/10074.0/100
Nearby amenities17681
Green cover8.4%1.6%
Population7,2684,894
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)5/107/10

Comparison summary

Queens Park is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, while St James is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.

Queens Park pulls ahead on housing affordability, parks and reserves, and public transport access, whereas St James is the better pick for walkability and stronger socioeconomic advantage. On housing, Queens Park sits in a expensive band, compared with a affordable feel in St James.

Investors and value-focused buyers may find Queens Park the better fit, while retirees, families, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer St James.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons