Ferndale vs Queens Park, WA Suburb Comparison

Ferndale for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

FerndaleQueens Park

Overall score

Ferndale

46.4/100

Queens Park

41.7/100

Crime rate

Ferndale

77.5 / 1k

Queens Park

77.5 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Ferndale

163

Queens Park

176

Population

Ferndale

4,457

Queens Park

7,268

Metric leadFerndale 5Queens Park 43 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryFerndaleQueens Park
Overall score46.4/10041.7/100
Housing (desirability)51.9/10036.1/100
Crime rate77.5 / 1k77.5 / 1k
Schools & preschools87
Weather (desirability)23.4/10023.4/100
Parks & reserves98
Public transport stops3456
Walkability47.0/10057.0/100
Nearby amenities163176
Green cover10.8%8.4%
Population4,4577,268
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)5/105/10

Comparison summary

Ferndale reads as an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap; Queens Park is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by. Ferndale sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Queens Park is closer to the city centre.

Ferndale tends to lead on housing affordability, schools and education options, and parks and reserves, while Queens Park stands out for public transport access, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities.

Investors may find Ferndale the better fit, while families and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Queens Park.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons