Overall score
Redwood Park
51.1/100
Wynn Vale
54.8/100
Wynn Vale for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Redwood Park
51.1/100
Wynn Vale
54.8/100
Crime rate
Redwood Park
16.1 / 1k
Wynn Vale
19.2 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Redwood Park
105
Wynn Vale
133
Population
Redwood Park
5,367
Wynn Vale
7,865
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Redwood Park | Wynn Vale |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 51.1/100 | 54.8/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 66.7/100 | 67.6/100 |
| Crime rate | 16.1 / 1k | 19.2 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 2 | 5 |
| Weather (desirability) | 37.3/100 | 37.3/100 |
| Public transport stops | 25 | 40 |
| Walkability | 61.0/100 | 55.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 105 | 133 |
| Planning activity | 51 | 70 |
| Green cover | 10.3% | 10.2% |
| Population | 5,367 | 7,865 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 6/10 | 6/10 |
Redwood Park is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, while Wynn Vale is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.
On the data, Redwood Park is stronger for a quieter safety profile, walkability, and tree cover and green space; Wynn Vale answers with housing affordability, schools and education options, and public transport access.
Choose Redwood Park if you are weighing retirees; lean toward Wynn Vale for families, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.