Overall score
Surrey Downs
63.4/100
Wynn Vale
72.3/100
Surrey Downs for investment; Wynn Vale for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Surrey Downs
63.4/100
Wynn Vale
72.3/100
Crime rate
Surrey Downs
39.6 / 1k
Wynn Vale
16.9 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Surrey Downs
84
Wynn Vale
129
Population
Surrey Downs
3,358
Wynn Vale
7,865
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Surrey Downs | Wynn Vale |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 63.4/100 | 72.3/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 74.2/100 | 76.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 39.6 / 1k | 16.9 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 2 | 5 |
| Public transport stops | 25 | 40 |
| Walkability | 74.0/100 | 55.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 84 | 129 |
| Planning activity | 54 | 55 |
| Population | 3,358 | 7,865 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 5/10 | 6/10 |
Surrey Downs reads as a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by; Wynn Vale is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.
Surrey Downs tends to lead on walkability and a calmer planning outlook, while Wynn Vale stands out for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Wynn Vale, while Surrey Downs remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.