Ridgehaven vs Surrey Downs, SA Suburb Comparison

Ridgehaven for families and investment; Surrey Downs for retirees.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

RidgehavenSurrey Downs

Overall score

Ridgehaven

48.7/100

Surrey Downs

49.6/100

Crime rate

Ridgehaven

30.6 / 1k

Surrey Downs

48.6 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Ridgehaven

124

Surrey Downs

85

Population

Ridgehaven

4,304

Surrey Downs

3,358

Metric leadRidgehaven 6Surrey Downs 42 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryRidgehavenSurrey Downs
Overall score48.7/10049.6/100
Housing (desirability)77.6/10069.2/100
Crime rate30.6 / 1k48.6 / 1k
Schools & preschools22
Weather (desirability)37.3/10037.3/100
Public transport stops2725
Walkability59.0/10074.0/100
Nearby amenities12485
Planning activity6163
Green cover5.6%17.3%
Population4,3043,358
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)4/105/10

Comparison summary

Ridgehaven reads as a hillside mid-sized suburb with greener streets and a quieter pace; Surrey Downs is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by. Ridgehaven sits among greener hillside streets, while Surrey Downs keeps a flatter suburban layout.

On the data, Ridgehaven is stronger for a quieter safety profile, public transport access, and nearby cafés and amenities; Surrey Downs answers with housing affordability, walkability, and tree cover and green space.

Families may find Ridgehaven the better fit, while investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Surrey Downs.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons