Greenwith vs Surrey Downs, SA Suburb Comparison

Greenwith for investment; Surrey Downs for retirees.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

GreenwithSurrey Downs

Overall score

Greenwith

53.8/100

Surrey Downs

49.6/100

Crime rate

Greenwith

16.1 / 1k

Surrey Downs

48.6 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Greenwith

139

Surrey Downs

85

Population

Greenwith

10,103

Surrey Downs

3,358

Metric leadGreenwith 6Surrey Downs 33 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryGreenwithSurrey Downs
Overall score53.8/10049.6/100
Housing (desirability)60.6/10069.2/100
Crime rate16.1 / 1k48.6 / 1k
Schools & preschools22
Weather (desirability)37.3/10037.3/100
Public transport stops4825
Walkability74.0/10074.0/100
Nearby amenities13985
Planning activity6563
Green cover10.3%17.3%
Population10,1033,358
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)7/105/10

Comparison summary

Greenwith is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, while Surrey Downs is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.

Greenwith tends to lead on a quieter safety profile, public transport access, and nearby cafés and amenities, while Surrey Downs stands out for housing affordability, tree cover and green space, and a calmer planning outlook.

Choose Greenwith if you are weighing retirees and families; lean toward Surrey Downs for investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons