Overall score
Golden Grove
58.9/100
Surrey Downs
63.4/100
Golden Grove for schools; Surrey Downs for investment and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Golden Grove
58.9/100
Surrey Downs
63.4/100
Crime rate
Golden Grove
44.0 / 1k
Surrey Downs
39.6 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Golden Grove
65
Surrey Downs
84
Population
Golden Grove
10,299
Surrey Downs
3,358
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Golden Grove | Surrey Downs |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 58.9/100 | 63.4/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 55.8/100 | 74.2/100 |
| Crime rate | 44.0 / 1k | 39.6 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 5 | 2 |
| Public transport stops | 75 | 25 |
| Walkability | 70.0/100 | 74.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 65 | 84 |
| Planning activity | 55 | 54 |
| Population | 10,299 | 3,358 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 7/10 | 5/10 |
Golden Grove reads as an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap; Surrey Downs is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.
Golden Grove tends to lead on schools and education options and public transport access, while Surrey Downs stands out for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.
Households prioritising schools may find Golden Grove the better fit, while investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Surrey Downs.