Golden Grove vs Surrey Downs, SA Suburb Comparison

Surrey Downs for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Golden GroveSurrey Downs

Overall score

Golden Grove

47.3/100

Surrey Downs

49.6/100

Crime rate

Golden Grove

36.0 / 1k

Surrey Downs

48.6 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Golden Grove

76

Surrey Downs

85

Population

Golden Grove

10,299

Surrey Downs

3,358

Metric leadGolden Grove 5Surrey Downs 61 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryGolden GroveSurrey Downs
Overall score47.3/10049.6/100
Housing (desirability)66.8/10069.2/100
Crime rate36.0 / 1k48.6 / 1k
Schools & preschools52
Weather (desirability)37.3/10037.3/100
Public transport stops7525
Walkability70.0/10074.0/100
Nearby amenities7685
Planning activity7063
Green cover4.4%17.3%
Population10,2993,358
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)7/105/10

Comparison summary

Golden Grove reads as an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap; Surrey Downs is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.

Golden Grove tends to lead on a quieter safety profile, schools and education options, and public transport access, while Surrey Downs stands out for housing affordability, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities.

Retirees, families, and households prioritising schools may find Golden Grove the better fit, while investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Surrey Downs.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons