Richlands vs Wacol, QLD suburb comparison

Richlands for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

RichlandsWacol

Overall score

Richlands

60.5/100

Wacol

40.7/100

Crime rate

Richlands

58.9 / 1k

Wacol

98.8 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Richlands

131

Wacol

74

Population

Richlands

5,621

Wacol

4,253

Metric leadRichlands 8Wacol 11 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryRichlandsWacol
Overall score60.5/10040.7/100
Housing (desirability)76.0/10076.0/100
Crime rate58.9 / 1k98.8 / 1k
Schools & preschools31
Parks & reserves27
Public transport stops2221
Walkability100.0/10030.0/100
Nearby amenities13174
Population5,6214,253
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)4/101/10

Comparison summary

Richlands reads as a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby; Wacol is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

On the data, Richlands is stronger for a quieter safety profile and public transport access; Wacol answers with parks and reserves. On housing, Richlands sits in a expensive band, compared with a affordable feel in Wacol.

On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Richlands, while Wacol remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons