Sumner vs Wacol, QLD Suburb Comparison

Sumner for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

SumnerWacol

Overall score

Sumner

58.8/100

Wacol

28.7/100

Crime rate

Sumner

47.9 / 1k

Wacol

162.3 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Sumner

23

Wacol

79

Population

Sumner

603

Wacol

4,253

Metric leadSumner 6Wacol 51 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategorySumnerWacol
Overall score58.8/10028.7/100
Housing (desirability)51.5/10038.4/100
Crime rate47.9 / 1k162.3 / 1k
Schools & preschools41
Weather (desirability)42.8/10042.8/100
Parks & reserves17
Public transport stops321
Walkability6.5/10030.0/100
Nearby amenities2379
Green cover27.2%16.2%
Population6034,253
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)9/101/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Sumner is a sought-after metro smaller community where housing reflects strong local demand, and Wacol is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

Sumner tends to lead on a quieter safety profile, schools and education options, and overall desirability, while Wacol stands out for parks and reserves, public transport access, and walkability. Sumner generally means more sought-after housing, while Wacol leans toward more approachable housing costs.

On balance, retirees, families, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Sumner, while Wacol remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons