Sumner vs Wacol, QLD suburb comparison

Sumner for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

SumnerWacol

Overall score

Sumner

44.0/100

Wacol

40.7/100

Crime rate

Sumner

31.2 / 1k

Wacol

98.8 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Sumner

22

Wacol

74

Population

Sumner

603

Wacol

4,253

Metric leadSumner 4Wacol 51 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategorySumnerWacol
Overall score44.0/10040.7/100
Housing (desirability)76.0/10076.0/100
Crime rate31.2 / 1k98.8 / 1k
Schools & preschools41
Parks & reserves17
Public transport stops321
Walkability6.5/10030.0/100
Nearby amenities2274
Population6034,253
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)9/101/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Sumner is a well-connected metro smaller community with a familiar suburban feel, and Wacol is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

Sumner tends to lead on a quieter safety profile and stronger socioeconomic advantage, while Wacol stands out for parks and reserves and public transport access. Sumner generally means more sought-after housing, while Wacol leans toward more approachable housing costs.

Sumner suits retirees and families more clearly, whereas Wacol is the stronger match for households prioritising schools.

Related comparisons