Rockingham vs Shoalwater, WA suburb comparison

Rockingham for families and beach lifestyle; Shoalwater for retirees.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

RockinghamShoalwater

Overall score

Rockingham

64.2/100

Shoalwater

45.9/100

Crime rate

Rockingham

877.4 / 1k

Shoalwater

3331.5 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Rockingham

225

Shoalwater

88

Population

Rockingham

15,312

Shoalwater

4,368

Metric leadRockingham 9Shoalwater 1across 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryRockinghamShoalwater
Overall score64.2/10045.9/100
Housing (desirability)52.4/10041.6/100
Crime rate877.4 / 1k3331.5 / 1k
Schools & preschools93
Parks & reserves184
Public transport stops13828
Walkability100.0/10057.0/100
Nearby amenities22588
Population15,3124,368
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)2/103/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Rockingham is a beachside established suburb where the coast sets the tone, and Shoalwater is a coastal mid-sized suburb with an easy, sea-led rhythm.

Rockingham tends to lead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, while Shoalwater stands out for stronger socioeconomic advantage.

Families and people chasing a beach lifestyle may find Rockingham the better fit, while retirees and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Shoalwater.

Related comparisons