Overall score
Rosny
48.3/100
Warrane
43.4/100
Rosny vs Warrane, TAS Suburb Comparison
Rosny for investment and schools; Warrane for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
RosnyWarrane
Crime rate
Rosny
55.5 / 1k
Warrane
55.5 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Rosny
19
Warrane
67
Population
Rosny
842
Warrane
2,695
Metric leadRosny 4Warrane 62 tiedacross 12 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Rosny | Warrane |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 48.3/100 | 43.4/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 56.1/100 | 70.3/100 |
| Crime rate | 55.5 / 1k | 55.5 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 6 | 4 |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 5 |
| Public transport stops | 7 | 27 |
| Walkability | 10.5/100 | 30.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 19 | 67 |
| Green cover | 21.6% | 11.0% |
| Population | 842 | 2,695 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 1/10 |
Comparison summary
Rosny reads as a metro smaller community with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm; Warrane is a leafier hillside mid-sized suburb with elevated outlooks. Warrane sits among greener hillside streets, while Rosny keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Rosny pulls ahead on schools and education options, plus stronger socioeconomic advantage, whereas Warrane is the better pick for housing affordability, parks and reserves, and public transport access. On housing, Rosny sits in a expensive band, compared with a affordable feel in Warrane.
Rosny suits retirees, families, and households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Warrane is the stronger match for investors and value-focused buyers.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.