Overall score
Royal Park
54.1/100
Tennyson
46.9/100
Royal Park for investment and value; Tennyson for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Royal Park
54.1/100
Tennyson
46.9/100
Crime rate
Royal Park
65.5 / 1k
Tennyson
28.9 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Royal Park
174
Tennyson
88
Population
Royal Park
3,453
Tennyson
1,137
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Royal Park | Tennyson |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 54.1/100 | 46.9/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 47.7/100 | 24.5/100 |
| Crime rate | 65.5 / 1k | 28.9 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 3 | — |
| Public transport stops | 19 | 12 |
| Walkability | 82.5/100 | 18.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 174 | 88 |
| Planning activity | 43 | 10 |
| Population | 3,453 | 1,137 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 3/10 | 10/10 |
Royal Park is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, while Tennyson is a coastal smaller community with an easy, sea-led rhythm. Tennyson leans into coastal living, while Royal Park feels more inland and suburban in character.
Royal Park tends to lead on housing affordability and public transport access, while Tennyson stands out for a quieter safety profile and a calmer planning outlook. On housing, Royal Park sits in a affordable band, compared with a expensive feel in Tennyson.
Investors and value-focused buyers may find Royal Park the better fit, while retirees and families are more likely to prefer Tennyson.