Rutherford vs Telarah, NSW Suburb Comparison

Rutherford for retirees and investment; Telarah for families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

RutherfordTelarah

Overall score

Rutherford

39.9/100

Telarah

36.1/100

Crime rate

Rutherford

95.4 / 1k

Telarah

95.5 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Rutherford

376

Telarah

45

Population

Rutherford

13,091

Telarah

2,318

Metric leadRutherford 10Telarah 21 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryRutherfordTelarah
Overall score39.9/10036.1/100
Housing (desirability)64.5/10059.4/100
Crime rate95.4 / 1k95.5 / 1k
Schools & preschools36
Weather (desirability)60.5/10060.5/100
Parks & reserves42
Public transport stops26233
Walkability85.0/10072.0/100
Nearby amenities37645
Planning activity6112
Green cover4.5%0.7%
Population13,0912,318
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)2/101/10

Comparison summary

Rutherford reads as a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby; Telarah is a lively metro smaller community with dining and everyday convenience close by.

On the data, Rutherford is stronger for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and parks and reserves; Telarah answers with schools and education options, plus a calmer planning outlook.

On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Rutherford, while Telarah remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons