Samson vs South Fremantle, WA suburb comparison

Samson for investment; South Fremantle for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

SamsonSouth Fremantle

Overall score

Samson

43.1/100

South Fremantle

68.8/100

Crime rate

Samson

6037.0 / 1k

South Fremantle

3365.4 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Samson

24

South Fremantle

227

Population

Samson

1,881

South Fremantle

3,398

Metric leadSamson 2South Fremantle 7across 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategorySamsonSouth Fremantle
Overall score43.1/10068.8/100
Housing (desirability)76.0/10067.2/100
Crime rate6037.0 / 1k3365.4 / 1k
Schools & preschools86
Parks & reserves7
Public transport stops1417
Walkability21.0/10095.5/100
Nearby amenities24227
Population1,8813,398
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)7/1010/10

Comparison summary

Samson reads as a well-connected metro smaller community with a familiar suburban feel; South Fremantle is a coastal mid-sized suburb with an easy, sea-led rhythm. Where South Fremantle is shaped by the coast, Samson offers a more landlocked suburban rhythm.

Samson tends to lead on housing affordability, while South Fremantle stands out for a quieter safety profile and public transport access.

Samson suits investors and households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas South Fremantle is the stronger match for retirees and families.

Related comparisons