Samson vs South Fremantle, WA Suburb Comparison

South Fremantle for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

SamsonSouth Fremantle

Overall score

Samson

47.0/100

South Fremantle

64.1/100

Crime rate

Samson

53.7 / 1k

South Fremantle

53.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Samson

32

South Fremantle

415

Population

Samson

1,881

South Fremantle

3,398

Metric leadSamson 3South Fremantle 62 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategorySamsonSouth Fremantle
Overall score47.0/10064.1/100
Housing (desirability)72.5/10070.7/100
Crime rate53.7 / 1k53.7 / 1k
Schools & preschools86
Weather (desirability)23.4/10023.4/100
Parks & reserves—7
Public transport stops1417
Walkability21.0/10095.5/100
Nearby amenities32415
Green cover17.9%4.9%
Population1,8813,398
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)7/1010/10

Comparison summary

Samson reads as a sought-after metro smaller community where housing reflects strong local demand; South Fremantle is a coastal mid-sized suburb with an easy, sea-led rhythm. Where South Fremantle is shaped by the coast, Samson offers a more landlocked suburban rhythm.

Samson tends to lead on housing affordability, plus schools and education options, while South Fremantle stands out for public transport access, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities.

Samson suits investors more clearly, whereas South Fremantle is the stronger match for retirees, families, people chasing a beach lifestyle, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons