Seacombe Gardens vs Tonsley, SA Suburb Comparison

Seacombe Gardens for families and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Seacombe GardensTonsley

Overall score

Seacombe Gardens

39.3/100

Tonsley

33.6/100

Crime rate

Seacombe Gardens

39.6 / 1k

Tonsley

118.2 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Seacombe Gardens

66

Tonsley

87

Population

Seacombe Gardens

3,373

Tonsley

743

Metric leadSeacombe Gardens 7Tonsley 32 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategorySeacombe GardensTonsley
Overall score39.3/10033.6/100
Housing (desirability)79.3/10055.8/100
Crime rate39.6 / 1k118.2 / 1k
Schools & preschools31
Weather (desirability)56.4/10056.4/100
Public transport stops147
Walkability40.0/10016.5/100
Nearby amenities6687
Planning activity4513
Green cover3.5%3.9%
Population3,373743
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)4/104/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Seacombe Gardens is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, and Tonsley is a well-serviced metro smaller community with plenty happening nearby. Seacombe Gardens sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Tonsley is closer to the city centre.

Seacombe Gardens tends to lead on housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and schools and education options, while Tonsley stands out for nearby cafés and amenities, tree cover and green space, and a calmer planning outlook.

On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Seacombe Gardens, while Tonsley remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons