Seacombe Heights vs Warradale, SA Suburb Comparison

Seacombe Heights for families and investment; Warradale for schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Seacombe HeightsWarradale

Overall score

Seacombe Heights

49.3/100

Warradale

50.1/100

Crime rate

Seacombe Heights

14.5 / 1k

Warradale

27.9 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Seacombe Heights

29

Warradale

115

Population

Seacombe Heights

1,549

Warradale

5,801

Metric leadSeacombe Heights 3Warradale 72 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategorySeacombe HeightsWarradale
Overall score49.3/10050.1/100
Housing (desirability)66.4/10066.8/100
Crime rate14.5 / 1k27.9 / 1k
Schools & preschools14
Weather (desirability)56.4/10056.4/100
Public transport stops1031
Walkability15.0/10078.0/100
Nearby amenities29115
Planning activity1575
Green cover7.5%1.9%
Population1,5495,801
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)8/108/10

Comparison summary

Seacombe Heights is a hillside smaller community with greener streets and a quieter pace, while Warradale is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby. Seacombe Heights sits among greener hillside streets, while Warradale keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Seacombe Heights tends to lead on housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and tree cover and green space, while Warradale stands out for schools and education options, public transport access, and walkability.

Seacombe Heights suits retirees and investors more clearly, whereas Warradale is the stronger match for households prioritising schools.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons