Seacombe Heights vs Warradale, SA suburb comparison

Seacombe Heights for retirees and investment; Warradale for families and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Seacombe HeightsWarradale

Overall score

Seacombe Heights

47.3/100

Warradale

60.3/100

Crime rate

Seacombe Heights

22.0 / 1k

Warradale

27.1 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Seacombe Heights

27

Warradale

113

Population

Seacombe Heights

1,549

Warradale

5,801

Metric leadSeacombe Heights 3Warradale 61 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategorySeacombe HeightsWarradale
Overall score47.3/10060.3/100
Housing (desirability)52.7/10037.8/100
Crime rate22.0 / 1k27.1 / 1k
Schools & preschools14
Public transport stops1031
Walkability15.0/10078.0/100
Nearby amenities27113
Planning activity1160
Population1,5495,801
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)8/108/10

Comparison summary

Seacombe Heights is a hillside smaller community with greener streets and a quieter pace, while Warradale is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby. Seacombe Heights sits among greener hillside streets, while Warradale keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Seacombe Heights tends to lead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, while Warradale stands out for schools and education options and public transport access.

Seacombe Heights suits retirees more clearly, whereas Warradale is the stronger match for families and investors.

Related comparisons