Overall score
Seacombe Heights
47.3/100
Warradale
60.3/100
Seacombe Heights for retirees and investment; Warradale for families and schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Seacombe Heights
47.3/100
Warradale
60.3/100
Crime rate
Seacombe Heights
22.0 / 1k
Warradale
27.1 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Seacombe Heights
27
Warradale
113
Population
Seacombe Heights
1,549
Warradale
5,801
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Seacombe Heights | Warradale |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 47.3/100 | 60.3/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 52.7/100 | 37.8/100 |
| Crime rate | 22.0 / 1k | 27.1 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | 4 |
| Public transport stops | 10 | 31 |
| Walkability | 15.0/100 | 78.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 27 | 113 |
| Planning activity | 11 | 60 |
| Population | 1,549 | 5,801 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 8/10 | 8/10 |
Seacombe Heights is a hillside smaller community with greener streets and a quieter pace, while Warradale is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby. Seacombe Heights sits among greener hillside streets, while Warradale keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Seacombe Heights tends to lead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, while Warradale stands out for schools and education options and public transport access.
Seacombe Heights suits retirees more clearly, whereas Warradale is the stronger match for families and investors.