Overall score
Seaham
42.2/100
Wallalong
51.2/100
Seaham for retirees; Wallalong for families and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Seaham
42.2/100
Wallalong
51.2/100
Crime rate
Seaham
105.4 / 1k
Wallalong
95.2 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Seaham
1
Wallalong
13
Population
Seaham
1,011
Wallalong
1,049
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Seaham | Wallalong |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 42.2/100 | 51.2/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 50.8/100 | 49.6/100 |
| Crime rate | 105.4 / 1k | 95.2 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | — |
| Weather (desirability) | 60.5/100 | 60.5/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 1 |
| Public transport stops | 25 | 14 |
| Walkability | 30.0/100 | 21.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 1 | 13 |
| Planning activity | 10 | 10 |
| Green cover | 7.4% | 3.4% |
| Population | 1,011 | 1,049 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 7/10 | 8/10 |
Put side by side, Seaham is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe, and Wallalong is a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace.
Seaham pulls ahead on public transport access, walkability, and overall desirability, whereas Wallalong is the better pick for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and nearby cafés and amenities.
On balance, families and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Seaham, while Wallalong remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.