South Hobart vs Tolmans Hill, TAS Suburb Comparison

South Hobart for retirees and families; Tolmans Hill for investment and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

South HobartTolmans Hill

Overall score

South Hobart

49.1/100

Tolmans Hill

40.8/100

Crime rate

South Hobart

87.2 / 1k

Tolmans Hill

87.2 / 1k

Nearby amenities

South Hobart

151

Tolmans Hill

6

Population

South Hobart

5,886

Tolmans Hill

647

Metric leadSouth Hobart 7Tolmans Hill 22 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategorySouth HobartTolmans Hill
Overall score49.1/10040.8/100
Housing (desirability)56.4/10050.8/100
Crime rate87.2 / 1k87.2 / 1k
Schools & preschools13
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves3—
Public transport stops746
Walkability32.0/1009.0/100
Nearby amenities1516
Green cover23.8%0.0%
Population5,886647
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)9/1010/10

Comparison summary

South Hobart is a hillside mid-sized suburb with greener streets and a quieter pace, while Tolmans Hill is a metro smaller community with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm. South Hobart sits among greener hillside streets, while Tolmans Hill keeps a flatter suburban layout.

On the data, South Hobart is stronger for public transport access, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities; Tolmans Hill answers with housing affordability, schools and education options, and stronger socioeconomic advantage.

On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Tolmans Hill, while South Hobart remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons