Surry Hills vs Zetland, NSW Suburb Comparison

Surry Hills for retirees and investment; Zetland for families and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Surry HillsZetland

Overall score

Surry Hills

54.1/100

Zetland

51.0/100

Crime rate

Surry Hills

208.3 / 1k

Zetland

89.6 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Surry Hills

757

Zetland

595

Population

Surry Hills

15,828

Zetland

12,622

Metric leadSurry Hills 8Zetland 23 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategorySurry HillsZetland
Overall score54.1/10051.0/100
Housing (desirability)49.6/10049.0/100
Crime rate208.3 / 1k89.6 / 1k
Schools & preschools2814
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves1514
Public transport stops6536
Walkability100.0/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities757595
Planning activity12753
Green cover8.0%5.8%
Population15,82812,622
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Surry Hills is a leafier hillside established suburb with elevated outlooks, and Zetland is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap. Surry Hills sits among greener hillside streets, while Zetland keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Surry Hills tends to lead on housing affordability, schools and education options, and parks and reserves, while Zetland stands out for a quieter safety profile and a calmer planning outlook.

On balance, families and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Surry Hills, while Zetland remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons