Overall score
Teralba
33.3/100
Woodrising
23.3/100
Teralba vs Woodrising, NSW suburb comparison
Teralba for retirees and investment; Woodrising for schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
TeralbaWoodrising
Crime rate
Teralba
90.7 / 1k
Woodrising
90.8 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Teralba
18
Woodrising
10
Population
Teralba
2,654
Woodrising
1,176
Metric leadTeralba 7Woodrising 21 tiedacross 10 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesTeralba
- Best for investmentTeralba
- Best for best valueTeralba
- Best for best schoolsWoodrising
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Teralba | Woodrising |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 33.3/100 | 23.3/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 65.9/100 | 65.9/100 |
| Crime rate | 90.7 / 1k | 90.8 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 2 | 5 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | — |
| Public transport stops | 30 | 12 |
| Walkability | 32.0/100 | 18.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 18 | 10 |
| Planning activity | 25 | 6 |
| Population | 2,654 | 1,176 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 6/10 | 3/10 |
Comparison summary
Teralba is a settled metro mid-sized suburb that balances access with everyday calm, while Woodrising is a practical metro smaller community with approachable housing and suburban calm.
Teralba pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile and public transport access, whereas Woodrising is the better pick for a calmer planning outlook. On housing, Teralba sits in a expensive band, compared with a affordable feel in Woodrising.
Retirees and investors may find Teralba the better fit, while households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Woodrising.