Overall score
Teralba
34.5/100
Woodrising
33.5/100
Teralba vs Woodrising, NSW Suburb Comparison
Teralba for families and investment; Woodrising for retirees.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
TeralbaWoodrising
Crime rate
Teralba
90.7 / 1k
Woodrising
90.8 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Teralba
22
Woodrising
11
Population
Teralba
2,654
Woodrising
1,176
Metric leadTeralba 8Woodrising 31 tiedacross 12 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesWoodrising
- Best for familiesTeralba
- Best for investmentTeralba
- Best for best schoolsTeralba
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Teralba | Woodrising |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 34.5/100 | 33.5/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 56.9/100 | 50.3/100 |
| Crime rate | 90.7 / 1k | 90.8 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 2 | 5 |
| Weather (desirability) | 60.5/100 | 60.5/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | — |
| Public transport stops | 30 | 12 |
| Walkability | 32.0/100 | 18.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 22 | 11 |
| Planning activity | 28 | 6 |
| Green cover | 2.6% | 11.8% |
| Population | 2,654 | 1,176 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 6/10 | 3/10 |
Comparison summary
Teralba is a metro mid-sized suburb with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm, while Woodrising is a metro smaller community with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm.
Teralba pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile, public transport access, and walkability, whereas Woodrising is the better pick for schools and education options, plus a calmer planning outlook.
Retirees, investors, and value-focused buyers may find Teralba the better fit, while households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Woodrising.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.