Overall score
The Gardens
50.0/100
Woolner
41.1/100
The Gardens vs Woolner, NT suburb comparison
Woolner for retirees and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
The GardensWoolner
Nearby amenities
The Gardens
204
Woolner
36
Population
The Gardens
726
Woolner
962
Metric leadThe Gardens 5Woolner 31 tiedacross 9 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | The Gardens | Woolner |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 50.0/100 | 41.1/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 7.2/100 | 16.3/100 |
| Schools & preschools | 7 | 7 |
| Parks & reserves | 3 | 2 |
| Public transport stops | 7 | 1 |
| Walkability | 18.5/100 | 3.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 204 | 36 |
| Population | 726 | 962 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 9/10 | 10/10 |
Comparison summary
The Gardens is a lively metro smaller community with dining and everyday convenience close by, while Woolner is a well-connected metro smaller community with a familiar suburban feel.
The Gardens pulls ahead on parks and reserves and public transport access, whereas Woolner is the better pick for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.
Families and households prioritising schools may find The Gardens the better fit, while retirees and investors are more likely to prefer Woolner.