Darwin City vs Woolner, NT Suburb Comparison

Darwin City for retirees; Woolner for families and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Darwin CityWoolner

Overall score

Darwin City

62.1/100

Woolner

52.8/100

Nearby amenities

Darwin City

643

Woolner

52

Population

Darwin City

7,149

Woolner

962

Metric leadDarwin City 7Woolner 22 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryDarwin CityWoolner
Overall score62.1/10052.8/100
Housing (desirability)48.1/10048.9/100
Schools & preschools27
Weather (desirability)9.6/1009.6/100
Parks & reserves82
Public transport stops141
Walkability91.0/1003.5/100
Nearby amenities64352
Green cover12.5%10.1%
Population7,149962
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Darwin City is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, while Woolner is a well-serviced metro smaller community with plenty happening nearby.

Darwin City pulls ahead on parks and reserves, public transport access, and walkability, whereas Woolner is the better pick for housing affordability, plus schools and education options.

Darwin City suits value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas Woolner is the stronger match for families, investors, and households prioritising schools.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons