Overall score
Darwin City
60.7/100
Stuart Park
51.7/100
Darwin City for retirees; Stuart Park for families and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Darwin City
60.7/100
Stuart Park
51.7/100
Crime rate
Darwin City
79.1 / 1k
Stuart Park
79.1 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Darwin City
643
Stuart Park
145
Population
Darwin City
7,149
Stuart Park
4,101
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Darwin City | Stuart Park |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 60.7/100 | 51.7/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 48.1/100 | 46.9/100 |
| Crime rate | 79.1 / 1k | 79.1 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 2 | 7 |
| Weather (desirability) | 9.6/100 | 9.6/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 8 | 8 |
| Public transport stops | 14 | 15 |
| Walkability | 91.0/100 | 49.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 643 | 145 |
| Green cover | 12.5% | 7.5% |
| Population | 7,149 | 4,101 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Darwin City is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, while Stuart Park is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby.
Darwin City pulls ahead on walkability, nearby cafés and amenities, and overall desirability, whereas Stuart Park is the better pick for housing affordability, schools and education options, and public transport access.
On balance, families, investors, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Stuart Park, while Darwin City remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.