Darwin City vs Stuart Park, NT Suburb Comparison

Darwin City for retirees; Stuart Park for families and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Darwin CityStuart Park

Overall score

Darwin City

60.7/100

Stuart Park

51.7/100

Crime rate

Darwin City

79.1 / 1k

Stuart Park

79.1 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Darwin City

643

Stuart Park

145

Population

Darwin City

7,149

Stuart Park

4,101

Metric leadDarwin City 6Stuart Park 24 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryDarwin CityStuart Park
Overall score60.7/10051.7/100
Housing (desirability)48.1/10046.9/100
Crime rate79.1 / 1k79.1 / 1k
Schools & preschools27
Weather (desirability)9.6/1009.6/100
Parks & reserves88
Public transport stops1415
Walkability91.0/10049.5/100
Nearby amenities643145
Green cover12.5%7.5%
Population7,1494,101
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Darwin City is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, while Stuart Park is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby.

Darwin City pulls ahead on walkability, nearby cafés and amenities, and overall desirability, whereas Stuart Park is the better pick for housing affordability, schools and education options, and public transport access.

On balance, families, investors, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Stuart Park, while Darwin City remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons