Overall score
Fannie Bay
60.7/100
Stuart Park
51.7/100
Fannie Bay vs Stuart Park, NT Suburb Comparison
Fannie Bay for retirees and investment; Stuart Park for schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
Fannie BayStuart Park
Crime rate
Fannie Bay
79.1 / 1k
Stuart Park
79.1 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Fannie Bay
157
Stuart Park
145
Population
Fannie Bay
2,875
Stuart Park
4,101
Metric leadFannie Bay 7Stuart Park 14 tiedacross 12 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesFannie Bay
- Best for investmentFannie Bay
- Best for best valueFannie Bay
- Best for best schoolsStuart Park
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Fannie Bay | Stuart Park |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 60.7/100 | 51.7/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 53.7/100 | 46.9/100 |
| Crime rate | 79.1 / 1k | 79.1 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 8 | 7 |
| Weather (desirability) | 9.6/100 | 9.6/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 12 | 8 |
| Public transport stops | 15 | 15 |
| Walkability | 65.5/100 | 49.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 157 | 145 |
| Green cover | 20.6% | 7.5% |
| Population | 2,875 | 4,101 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Comparison summary
Fannie Bay reads as an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap; Stuart Park is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby.
Fannie Bay pulls ahead on housing affordability, schools and education options, and parks and reserves, whereas Stuart Park is the better pick for a larger local community.
Fannie Bay suits investors and value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas Stuart Park is the stronger match for families and households prioritising schools.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.