Overall score
Darwin City
62.1/100
Fannie Bay
62.1/100
Darwin City for retirees and schools; Fannie Bay for families and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Darwin City
62.1/100
Fannie Bay
62.1/100
Nearby amenities
Darwin City
643
Fannie Bay
157
Population
Darwin City
7,149
Fannie Bay
2,875
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Darwin City | Fannie Bay |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 62.1/100 | 62.1/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 48.1/100 | 53.7/100 |
| Schools & preschools | 2 | 8 |
| Weather (desirability) | 9.6/100 | 9.6/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 8 | 12 |
| Public transport stops | 14 | 15 |
| Walkability | 91.0/100 | 65.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 643 | 157 |
| Green cover | 12.5% | 20.6% |
| Population | 7,149 | 2,875 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Darwin City is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, while Fannie Bay is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.
Darwin City pulls ahead on walkability, nearby cafés and amenities, and overall desirability, whereas Fannie Bay is the better pick for housing affordability, schools and education options, and parks and reserves.
On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Fannie Bay, while Darwin City remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.