Overall score
Fannie Bay
62.1/100
Parap
57.9/100
Fannie Bay vs Parap, NT Suburb Comparison
Fannie Bay for retirees and value; Parap for investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
Fannie BayParap
Nearby amenities
Fannie Bay
157
Parap
181
Population
Fannie Bay
2,875
Parap
2,819
Metric leadFannie Bay 8Parap 12 tiedacross 11 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesFannie Bay
- Best for investmentParap
- Best for best valueFannie Bay
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Fannie Bay | Parap |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 62.1/100 | 57.9/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 53.7/100 | 49.4/100 |
| Schools & preschools | 8 | 8 |
| Weather (desirability) | 9.6/100 | 9.6/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 12 | 9 |
| Public transport stops | 15 | 13 |
| Walkability | 65.5/100 | 47.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 157 | 181 |
| Green cover | 20.6% | 4.8% |
| Population | 2,875 | 2,819 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 9/10 |
Comparison summary
Fannie Bay reads as an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap; Parap is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.
Fannie Bay tends to lead on housing affordability, parks and reserves, and public transport access, while Parap stands out for nearby cafés and amenities.
On balance, retirees, investors, and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Fannie Bay, while Parap remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.