Overall score
Fannie Bay
64.0/100
Parap
55.2/100
Fannie Bay vs Parap, NT suburb comparison
Fannie Bay for retirees and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
Fannie BayParap
Nearby amenities
Fannie Bay
130
Parap
162
Population
Fannie Bay
2,875
Parap
2,819
Metric leadFannie Bay 7Parap 11 tiedacross 9 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesFannie Bay
- Best for investmentFannie Bay
- Best for best valueFannie Bay
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Fannie Bay | Parap |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 64.0/100 | 55.2/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 27.1/100 | 6.3/100 |
| Schools & preschools | 8 | 8 |
| Parks & reserves | 12 | 9 |
| Public transport stops | 15 | 13 |
| Walkability | 65.5/100 | 47.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 130 | 162 |
| Population | 2,875 | 2,819 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 9/10 |
Comparison summary
Fannie Bay reads as an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap; Parap is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.
Fannie Bay tends to lead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, while Parap stands out for nearby cafés and amenities.
Choose Fannie Bay if you are weighing retirees and investors; lean toward Parap for families and households prioritising schools.