Overall score
Ludmilla
52.3/100
Parap
57.9/100
Ludmilla vs Parap, NT Suburb Comparison
Ludmilla for value; Parap for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
LudmillaParap
Nearby amenities
Ludmilla
76
Parap
181
Population
Ludmilla
1,667
Parap
2,819
Metric leadLudmilla 1Parap 82 tiedacross 11 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Ludmilla | Parap |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 52.3/100 | 57.9/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 45.5/100 | 49.4/100 |
| Schools & preschools | 3 | 8 |
| Weather (desirability) | 9.6/100 | 9.6/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 5 | 9 |
| Public transport stops | 13 | 13 |
| Walkability | 36.5/100 | 47.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 76 | 181 |
| Green cover | 25.9% | 4.8% |
| Population | 1,667 | 2,819 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 5/10 | 9/10 |
Comparison summary
Ludmilla is an energetic metro smaller community where cafés and local life overlap, while Parap is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.
Ludmilla pulls ahead on housing affordability, whereas Parap is the better pick for schools and education options, parks and reserves, and walkability. On housing, Ludmilla sits in a well priced band, compared with a expensive feel in Parap.
Investors and value-focused buyers may find Ludmilla the better fit, while retirees, families, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Parap.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.