Ludmilla vs Parap, NT suburb comparison

Ludmilla for investment and value; Parap for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

LudmillaParap

Overall score

Ludmilla

49.4/100

Parap

53.0/100

Crime rate

Ludmilla

2340.7 / 1k

Parap

1430.6 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Ludmilla

55

Parap

162

Population

Ludmilla

1,667

Parap

2,819

Metric leadLudmilla 1Parap 81 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryLudmillaParap
Overall score49.4/10053.0/100
Housing (desirability)48.8/1006.3/100
Crime rate2340.7 / 1k1430.6 / 1k
Schools & preschools38
Parks & reserves59
Public transport stops1313
Walkability36.5/10047.5/100
Nearby amenities55162
Population1,6672,819
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)5/109/10

Comparison summary

Ludmilla is an energetic metro smaller community where cafés and local life overlap, while Parap is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

Ludmilla pulls ahead on housing affordability, whereas Parap is the better pick for a quieter safety profile and parks and reserves. On housing, Ludmilla sits in a well priced band, compared with a expensive feel in Parap.

Investors and value-focused buyers may find Ludmilla the better fit, while retirees and families are more likely to prefer Parap.

Related comparisons