Overall score
Darwin City
63.9/100
Ludmilla
51.6/100
Darwin City vs Ludmilla, NT suburb comparison
Darwin City for retirees and families; Ludmilla for investment and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
Darwin CityLudmilla
Nearby amenities
Darwin City
607
Ludmilla
55
Population
Darwin City
7,149
Ludmilla
1,667
Metric leadDarwin City 7Ludmilla 2across 9 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesDarwin City
- Best for familiesDarwin City
- Best for investmentLudmilla
- Best for best valueLudmilla
- Best for best schoolsDarwin City
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Darwin City | Ludmilla |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 63.9/100 | 51.6/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 3.6/100 | 48.8/100 |
| Schools & preschools | 2 | 3 |
| Parks & reserves | 8 | 5 |
| Public transport stops | 14 | 13 |
| Walkability | 91.0/100 | 36.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 607 | 55 |
| Population | 7,149 | 1,667 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 5/10 |
Comparison summary
Darwin City reads as a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby; Ludmilla is an energetic metro smaller community where cafés and local life overlap.
Darwin City tends to lead on a quieter safety profile and parks and reserves, while Ludmilla stands out for housing affordability. On housing, Darwin City sits in a expensive band, compared with a well priced feel in Ludmilla.
Retirees and families may find Darwin City the better fit, while investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Ludmilla.