Darwin City vs Ludmilla, NT Suburb Comparison

Darwin City for retirees and schools; Ludmilla for investment and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Darwin CityLudmilla

Overall score

Darwin City

62.1/100

Ludmilla

52.3/100

Nearby amenities

Darwin City

643

Ludmilla

76

Population

Darwin City

7,149

Ludmilla

1,667

Metric leadDarwin City 8Ludmilla 21 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryDarwin CityLudmilla
Overall score62.1/10052.3/100
Housing (desirability)48.1/10045.5/100
Schools & preschools23
Weather (desirability)9.6/1009.6/100
Parks & reserves85
Public transport stops1413
Walkability91.0/10036.5/100
Nearby amenities64376
Green cover12.5%25.9%
Population7,1491,667
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/105/10

Comparison summary

Darwin City reads as a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby; Ludmilla is an energetic metro smaller community where cafés and local life overlap.

Darwin City tends to lead on parks and reserves, public transport access, and walkability, while Ludmilla stands out for housing affordability, plus schools and education options. On housing, Darwin City sits in a expensive band, compared with a well priced feel in Ludmilla.

Retirees, families, and households prioritising schools may find Darwin City the better fit, while investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Ludmilla.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons