Overall score
Coconut Grove
54.8/100
Ludmilla
51.6/100
Coconut Grove vs Ludmilla, NT suburb comparison
Coconut Grove for families and schools; Ludmilla for retirees and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
Coconut GroveLudmilla
Nearby amenities
Coconut Grove
97
Ludmilla
55
Population
Coconut Grove
2,892
Ludmilla
1,667
Metric leadCoconut Grove 5Ludmilla 22 tiedacross 9 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesLudmilla
- Best for familiesCoconut Grove
- Best for investmentLudmilla
- Best for best valueLudmilla
- Best for best schoolsCoconut Grove
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Coconut Grove | Ludmilla |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 54.8/100 | 51.6/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 15.7/100 | 48.8/100 |
| Schools & preschools | 5 | 3 |
| Parks & reserves | 2 | 5 |
| Public transport stops | 13 | 13 |
| Walkability | 50.5/100 | 36.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 97 | 55 |
| Population | 2,892 | 1,667 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 5/10 | 5/10 |
Comparison summary
Coconut Grove reads as a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby; Ludmilla is an energetic metro smaller community where cafés and local life overlap.
Coconut Grove tends to lead on a quieter safety profile and walkability, while Ludmilla stands out for housing affordability and parks and reserves.
Choose Coconut Grove if you are weighing families; lean toward Ludmilla for retirees and investors.