Coconut Grove vs Ludmilla, NT Suburb Comparison

Coconut Grove for retirees and schools; Ludmilla for investment and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Coconut GroveLudmilla

Overall score

Coconut Grove

59.1/100

Ludmilla

52.3/100

Nearby amenities

Coconut Grove

113

Ludmilla

76

Population

Coconut Grove

2,892

Ludmilla

1,667

Metric leadCoconut Grove 6Ludmilla 23 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCoconut GroveLudmilla
Overall score59.1/10052.3/100
Housing (desirability)54.1/10045.5/100
Schools & preschools53
Weather (desirability)9.6/1009.6/100
Parks & reserves25
Public transport stops1313
Walkability50.5/10036.5/100
Nearby amenities11376
Green cover23.0%25.9%
Population2,8921,667
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)5/105/10

Comparison summary

Coconut Grove reads as a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby; Ludmilla is an energetic metro smaller community where cafés and local life overlap.

Coconut Grove tends to lead on schools and education options, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities, while Ludmilla stands out for housing affordability, plus parks and reserves.

Choose Coconut Grove if you are weighing families and households prioritising schools; lean toward Ludmilla for retirees, investors, and value-focused buyers.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons