Overall score
Coconut Grove
54.8/100
Parap
55.2/100
Coconut Grove vs Parap, NT suburb comparison
Coconut Grove for investment and value; Parap for retirees.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
Coconut GroveParap
Nearby amenities
Coconut Grove
97
Parap
162
Population
Coconut Grove
2,892
Parap
2,819
Metric leadCoconut Grove 3Parap 51 tiedacross 9 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesParap
- Best for investmentCoconut Grove
- Best for best valueCoconut Grove
- Best for best schoolsCoconut Grove
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Coconut Grove | Parap |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 54.8/100 | 55.2/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 15.7/100 | 6.3/100 |
| Schools & preschools | 5 | 8 |
| Parks & reserves | 2 | 9 |
| Public transport stops | 13 | 13 |
| Walkability | 50.5/100 | 47.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 97 | 162 |
| Population | 2,892 | 2,819 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 5/10 | 9/10 |
Comparison summary
Coconut Grove reads as a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby; Parap is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.
Coconut Grove pulls ahead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, whereas Parap is the better pick for parks and reserves and nearby cafés and amenities. On housing, Coconut Grove sits in a well priced band, compared with a expensive feel in Parap.
Coconut Grove suits investors and value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas Parap is the stronger match for retirees and households prioritising schools.