Overall score
Alawa
44.4/100
Coconut Grove
54.8/100
Alawa vs Coconut Grove, NT suburb comparison
Alawa for retirees and investment; Coconut Grove for families and schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
AlawaCoconut Grove
Nearby amenities
Alawa
46
Coconut Grove
97
Population
Alawa
2,078
Coconut Grove
2,892
Metric leadAlawa 3Coconut Grove 51 tiedacross 9 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesAlawa
- Best for familiesCoconut Grove
- Best for investmentAlawa
- Best for best schoolsCoconut Grove
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Alawa | Coconut Grove |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 44.4/100 | 54.8/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 24.9/100 | 15.7/100 |
| Schools & preschools | 14 | 5 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 2 |
| Public transport stops | 14 | 13 |
| Walkability | 21.0/100 | 50.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 46 | 97 |
| Population | 2,078 | 2,892 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 5/10 | 5/10 |
Comparison summary
Alawa is a lively metro smaller community with dining and everyday convenience close by, while Coconut Grove is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby.
On the data, Alawa is stronger for housing affordability and public transport access; Coconut Grove answers with a quieter safety profile and parks and reserves.
Alawa suits retirees and investors more clearly, whereas Coconut Grove is the stronger match for families.