Overall score
Ludmilla
52.3/100
Woolner
52.8/100
Ludmilla vs Woolner, NT Suburb Comparison
Ludmilla for retirees and value; Woolner for schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
LudmillaWoolner
Nearby amenities
Ludmilla
76
Woolner
52
Population
Ludmilla
1,667
Woolner
962
Metric leadLudmilla 6Woolner 41 tiedacross 11 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Ludmilla | Woolner |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 52.3/100 | 52.8/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 45.5/100 | 48.9/100 |
| Schools & preschools | 3 | 7 |
| Weather (desirability) | 9.6/100 | 9.6/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 5 | 2 |
| Public transport stops | 13 | 1 |
| Walkability | 36.5/100 | 3.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 76 | 52 |
| Green cover | 25.9% | 10.1% |
| Population | 1,667 | 962 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 5/10 | 10/10 |
Comparison summary
Ludmilla reads as an energetic metro smaller community where cafés and local life overlap; Woolner is a well-serviced metro smaller community with plenty happening nearby.
On the data, Ludmilla is stronger for housing affordability, parks and reserves, and public transport access; Woolner answers with schools and education options, plus stronger socioeconomic advantage. On housing, Ludmilla sits in a well priced band, compared with a expensive feel in Woolner.
Investors and value-focused buyers may find Ludmilla the better fit, while retirees, families, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Woolner.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.