Ludmilla vs Stuart Park, NT suburb comparison
Which suburb suits you better?
Side-by-side comparison of 16 categories from official government and open data.
| Category | Ludmilla | Stuart Park |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 45.6/100 | 49.4/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 48.8/100 | 11.6/100 |
| Crime rate | 1807.4 / 1k | 734.7 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | 5 | 8 |
| Public transport stops | 13 | 15 |
| Walkability | 36.5/100 | 49.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 55 | 124 |
| Population | 1,667 | 4,101 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 5/10 | 10/10 |
Quick verdicts
- Best for retireesStuart Park
- Best for familiesStuart Park
- Best for investmentLudmilla
- Best for best valueLudmilla
- Best for best schoolsStuart Park
Comparison summary
Ludmilla and Stuart Park offer different strengths across official suburb data. Stuart Park leads on more comparison categories overall. Overall score favours Stuart Park; Housing (desirability) favours Ludmilla; Crime rate favours Stuart Park. Quick verdicts: Retirees → Stuart Park, Families → Stuart Park, Investment → Ludmilla, Best value → Ludmilla.