Larrakeyah vs Stuart Park, NT Suburb Comparison

Larrakeyah for retirees and families; Stuart Park for investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

LarrakeyahStuart Park

Overall score

Larrakeyah

49.6/100

Stuart Park

53.1/100

Nearby amenities

Larrakeyah

130

Stuart Park

145

Population

Larrakeyah

3,943

Stuart Park

4,101

Metric leadLarrakeyah 1Stuart Park 82 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryLarrakeyahStuart Park
Overall score49.6/10053.1/100
Housing (desirability)39.5/10046.9/100
Schools & preschools37
Weather (desirability)9.6/1009.6/100
Parks & reserves78
Public transport stops1015
Walkability31.0/10049.5/100
Nearby amenities130145
Green cover11.0%7.5%
Population3,9434,101
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Larrakeyah is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, and Stuart Park is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby.

Larrakeyah tends to lead on an affluent, sought-after address, plus rapid growth and new development, while Stuart Park stands out for housing affordability, schools and education options, and parks and reserves.

On balance, families and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Stuart Park, while Larrakeyah remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons