Overall score
Larrakeyah
49.6/100
Stuart Park
53.1/100
Larrakeyah for retirees and families; Stuart Park for investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Larrakeyah
49.6/100
Stuart Park
53.1/100
Nearby amenities
Larrakeyah
130
Stuart Park
145
Population
Larrakeyah
3,943
Stuart Park
4,101
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Larrakeyah | Stuart Park |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 49.6/100 | 53.1/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 39.5/100 | 46.9/100 |
| Schools & preschools | 3 | 7 |
| Weather (desirability) | 9.6/100 | 9.6/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 7 | 8 |
| Public transport stops | 10 | 15 |
| Walkability | 31.0/100 | 49.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 130 | 145 |
| Green cover | 11.0% | 7.5% |
| Population | 3,943 | 4,101 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Put side by side, Larrakeyah is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, and Stuart Park is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby.
Larrakeyah tends to lead on an affluent, sought-after address, plus rapid growth and new development, while Stuart Park stands out for housing affordability, schools and education options, and parks and reserves.
On balance, families and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Stuart Park, while Larrakeyah remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.