Overall score
Tuckombil
47.0/100
Uralba
53.9/100
Uralba for retirees and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Tuckombil
47.0/100
Uralba
53.9/100
Crime rate
Tuckombil
40.0 / 1k
Uralba
39.3 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Tuckombil
3
Uralba
1
Population
Tuckombil
285
Uralba
266
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Tuckombil | Uralba |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 47.0/100 | 53.9/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 37.9/100 | 66.3/100 |
| Crime rate | 40.0 / 1k | 39.3 / 1k |
| Weather (desirability) | 47.5/100 | 47.5/100 |
| Parks & reserves | — | 1 |
| Public transport stops | 29 | 21 |
| Walkability | 30.0/100 | 30.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 3 | 1 |
| Planning activity | 4 | 2 |
| Green cover | 0.0% | 21.9% |
| Population | 285 | 266 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 8/10 | 8/10 |
Tuckombil reads as a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds; Uralba is a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace.
On the data, Tuckombil is stronger for public transport access, nearby cafés and amenities, and overall desirability; Uralba answers with housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and a calmer planning outlook.
Choose Tuckombil if you are weighing retirees; lean toward Uralba for investors and value-focused buyers.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.