Overall score
Acacia Hills
14.1/100
Humpty Doo
33.0/100
Acacia Hills vs Humpty Doo, NT suburb comparison
Acacia Hills for investment and value; Humpty Doo for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
Acacia HillsHumpty Doo
Nearby amenities
Acacia Hills
0
Humpty Doo
3
Population
Acacia Hills
711
Humpty Doo
4,313
Metric leadAcacia Hills 1Humpty Doo 5across 6 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesHumpty Doo
- Best for familiesHumpty Doo
- Best for investmentAcacia Hills
- Best for best valueAcacia Hills
- Best for best schoolsHumpty Doo
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Acacia Hills | Humpty Doo |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 14.1/100 | 33.0/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 47.6/100 | 6.6/100 |
| Schools & preschools | — | 3 |
| Public transport stops | — | 15 |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 22.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 0 | 3 |
| Population | 711 | 4,313 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 6/10 | 7/10 |
Comparison summary
Acacia Hills reads as a hills smaller community where tree cover and calm define the mood; Humpty Doo is a settled metro mid-sized suburb that balances access with everyday calm. Acacia Hills sits among greener hillside streets, while Humpty Doo keeps a flatter suburban layout.
On the data, Acacia Hills is stronger for housing affordability; Humpty Doo answers with walkability and nearby cafés and amenities.
Acacia Hills suits investors and value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas Humpty Doo is the stronger match for retirees and households prioritising schools.