Overall score
Acacia Hills
14.1/100
Noonamah
26.3/100
Acacia Hills vs Noonamah, NT suburb comparison
Acacia Hills for retirees; Noonamah for investment and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
Acacia HillsNoonamah
Nearby amenities
Acacia Hills
0
Noonamah
3
Population
Acacia Hills
711
Noonamah
328
Metric leadAcacia Hills 1Noonamah 41 tiedacross 6 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesAcacia Hills
- Best for investmentNoonamah
- Best for best valueNoonamah
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Acacia Hills | Noonamah |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 14.1/100 | 26.3/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 47.6/100 | 76.0/100 |
| Public transport stops | — | 9 |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 13.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 0 | 3 |
| Population | 711 | 328 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 6/10 | 6/10 |
Comparison summary
Acacia Hills is a hills smaller community where tree cover and calm define the mood, while Noonamah is a settled metro smaller community that balances access with everyday calm. Acacia Hills sits among greener hillside streets, while Noonamah keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Acacia Hills tends to lead on a larger local community, while Noonamah stands out for housing affordability and walkability.
Acacia Hills suits retirees more clearly, whereas Noonamah is the stronger match for investors and value-focused buyers.