Overall score
Acacia Hills
14.1/100
Livingstone
5.7/100
Acacia Hills vs Livingstone, NT suburb comparison
Acacia Hills for retirees and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
Acacia HillsLivingstone
Nearby amenities
Acacia Hills
0
Livingstone
0
Population
Acacia Hills
711
Livingstone
443
Metric leadAcacia Hills 4Livingstone 02 tiedacross 6 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesAcacia Hills
- Best for investmentAcacia Hills
- Best for best valueAcacia Hills
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Acacia Hills | Livingstone |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 14.1/100 | 5.7/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 47.6/100 | 3.3/100 |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 0 | 0 |
| Population | 711 | 443 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 6/10 | 5/10 |
Comparison summary
Acacia Hills reads as a hills smaller community where tree cover and calm define the mood; Livingstone is a practical metro smaller community with solid links to the wider city. Acacia Hills sits among greener hillside streets, while Livingstone keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Acacia Hills holds the clearer edge on housing affordability and overall desirability, while Livingstone is closer across the remaining categories.
On balance, retirees and investors are more likely to prefer Acacia Hills, while Livingstone remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.