Overall score
Livingstone
17.2/100
Tumbling Waters
13.3/100
Livingstone vs Tumbling Waters, NT Suburb Comparison
Livingstone for retirees.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
LivingstoneTumbling Waters
Nearby amenities
Livingstone
0
Tumbling Waters
1
Population
Livingstone
443
Tumbling Waters
254
Metric leadLivingstone 4Tumbling Waters 22 tiedacross 8 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesLivingstone
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Livingstone | Tumbling Waters |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 17.2/100 | 13.3/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 19.5/100 | 21.6/100 |
| Weather (desirability) | 5.7/100 | 5.7/100 |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 0 | 1 |
| Green cover | 3.0% | 0.0% |
| Population | 443 | 254 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 5/10 | 3/10 |
Comparison summary
Livingstone reads as a practical metro smaller community with solid links to the wider city; Tumbling Waters is a settled metro smaller community that keeps everyday living grounded and accessible.
Livingstone pulls ahead on a larger local community and stronger socioeconomic advantage, whereas Tumbling Waters is the better pick for housing affordability, nearby cafés and amenities, and overall desirability. Livingstone generally means more mid-market housing value, while Tumbling Waters leans toward more approachable housing costs.
Livingstone suits retirees more clearly, whereas Tumbling Waters is the stronger match for investors and value-focused buyers.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.