Overall score
Darwin River
17.0/100
Livingstone
17.2/100
Darwin River for investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Darwin River
17.0/100
Livingstone
17.2/100
Nearby amenities
Darwin River
6
Livingstone
0
Population
Darwin River
627
Livingstone
443
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Darwin River | Livingstone |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 17.0/100 | 17.2/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 35.7/100 | 19.5/100 |
| Weather (desirability) | 5.7/100 | 5.7/100 |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 6 | 0 |
| Green cover | 3.1% | 3.0% |
| Population | 627 | 443 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 3/10 | 5/10 |
Put side by side, Darwin River is a settled metro smaller community that keeps everyday living grounded and accessible, and Livingstone is a practical metro smaller community with solid links to the wider city.
Darwin River pulls ahead on housing affordability, nearby cafés and amenities, and a larger local community, whereas Livingstone is the better pick for overall desirability and stronger socioeconomic advantage. On housing, Darwin River sits in a affordable band, compared with a well priced feel in Livingstone.
On balance, retirees are more likely to prefer Livingstone, while Darwin River remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.