Overall score
Livingstone
5.7/100
Noonamah
26.3/100
Livingstone vs Noonamah, NT suburb comparison
Noonamah for investment and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
LivingstoneNoonamah
Nearby amenities
Livingstone
0
Noonamah
3
Population
Livingstone
443
Noonamah
328
Metric leadLivingstone 1Noonamah 5across 6 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Livingstone | Noonamah |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 5.7/100 | 26.3/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 3.3/100 | 76.0/100 |
| Public transport stops | — | 9 |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 13.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 0 | 3 |
| Population | 443 | 328 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 5/10 | 6/10 |
Comparison summary
Livingstone is a practical metro smaller community with solid links to the wider city, while Noonamah is a settled metro smaller community that balances access with everyday calm.
Livingstone tends to lead on a larger local community, while Noonamah stands out for housing affordability and walkability.
On balance, investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Noonamah, while Livingstone remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.