Overall score
Livingstone
17.2/100
Noonamah
29.7/100
Livingstone vs Noonamah, NT Suburb Comparison
Noonamah for retirees and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
LivingstoneNoonamah
Nearby amenities
Livingstone
0
Noonamah
3
Population
Livingstone
443
Noonamah
328
Metric leadLivingstone 1Noonamah 61 tiedacross 8 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Livingstone | Noonamah |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 17.2/100 | 29.7/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 19.5/100 | 41.9/100 |
| Weather (desirability) | 5.7/100 | 5.7/100 |
| Public transport stops | — | 9 |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 13.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 0 | 3 |
| Green cover | 3.0% | 15.1% |
| Population | 443 | 328 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 5/10 | 6/10 |
Comparison summary
Livingstone is a practical metro smaller community with solid links to the wider city, while Noonamah is a settled metro smaller community that balances access with everyday calm.
Livingstone tends to lead on a larger local community, while Noonamah stands out for housing affordability, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities.
On balance, investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Noonamah, while Livingstone remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.