McMinns Lagoon vs Noonamah, NT Suburb Comparison

McMinns Lagoon for retirees; Noonamah for investment and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

McMinns LagoonNoonamah

Overall score

McMinns Lagoon

38.2/100

Noonamah

29.7/100

Nearby amenities

McMinns Lagoon

1

Noonamah

3

Population

McMinns Lagoon

687

Noonamah

328

Metric leadMcMinns Lagoon 5Noonamah 4across 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryMcMinns LagoonNoonamah
Overall score38.2/10029.7/100
Housing (desirability)24.8/10041.9/100
Weather (desirability)9.6/1005.7/100
Public transport stops49
Walkability6.0/10013.5/100
Nearby amenities13
Green cover33.9%15.1%
Population687328
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)8/106/10

Comparison summary

McMinns Lagoon reads as a metro smaller community with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm; Noonamah is a settled metro smaller community that balances access with everyday calm.

On the data, McMinns Lagoon is stronger for a larger local community and stronger socioeconomic advantage; Noonamah answers with housing affordability, public transport access, and walkability. McMinns Lagoon generally means housing toward the upper end of the market, while Noonamah leans toward more mid-market housing value.

Retirees and families may find McMinns Lagoon the better fit, while investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Noonamah.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons