Overall score
McMinns Lagoon
38.2/100
Noonamah
29.7/100
McMinns Lagoon for retirees; Noonamah for investment and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
McMinns Lagoon
38.2/100
Noonamah
29.7/100
Nearby amenities
McMinns Lagoon
1
Noonamah
3
Population
McMinns Lagoon
687
Noonamah
328
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | McMinns Lagoon | Noonamah |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 38.2/100 | 29.7/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 24.8/100 | 41.9/100 |
| Weather (desirability) | 9.6/100 | 5.7/100 |
| Public transport stops | 4 | 9 |
| Walkability | 6.0/100 | 13.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 1 | 3 |
| Green cover | 33.9% | 15.1% |
| Population | 687 | 328 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 8/10 | 6/10 |
McMinns Lagoon reads as a metro smaller community with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm; Noonamah is a settled metro smaller community that balances access with everyday calm.
On the data, McMinns Lagoon is stronger for a larger local community and stronger socioeconomic advantage; Noonamah answers with housing affordability, public transport access, and walkability. McMinns Lagoon generally means housing toward the upper end of the market, while Noonamah leans toward more mid-market housing value.
Retirees and families may find McMinns Lagoon the better fit, while investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Noonamah.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.