Aldinga vs Sellicks Beach, SA Suburb Comparison

Aldinga for schools; Sellicks Beach for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

AldingaSellicks Beach

Overall score

Aldinga

43.8/100

Sellicks Beach

38.6/100

Crime rate

Aldinga

106.8 / 1k

Sellicks Beach

22.9 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Aldinga

75

Sellicks Beach

61

Population

Aldinga

764

Sellicks Beach

2,705

Metric leadAldinga 5Sellicks Beach 51 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryAldingaSellicks Beach
Overall score43.8/10038.6/100
Housing (desirability)49.6/10054.7/100
Crime rate106.8 / 1k22.9 / 1k
Schools & preschools5—
Weather (desirability)56.4/10056.4/100
Public transport stops1821
Walkability79.0/10034.0/100
Nearby amenities7561
Planning activity2457
Green cover0.0%1.5%
Population7642,705
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)5/103/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Aldinga is a lively metro smaller community with dining and everyday convenience close by, and Sellicks Beach is a coastal mid-sized suburb with an easy, sea-led rhythm. Where Sellicks Beach is shaped by the coast, Aldinga offers a more landlocked suburban rhythm.

Aldinga tends to lead on walkability, nearby cafés and amenities, and a calmer planning outlook, while Sellicks Beach stands out for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and public transport access. Aldinga generally means housing toward the upper end of the market, while Sellicks Beach leans toward more sought-after housing.

Aldinga suits households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Sellicks Beach is the stronger match for retirees, people chasing a beach lifestyle, investors, and value-focused buyers.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons